Seeing how lispers today still talking about how to do basic list processing with its unusable cons, and how they get giddy with 1980's macros (as opposed to full term rewriting), and still lack pattern matching, one feels kinda sad. Mathematica today in comparison to all other existing langs, can be perhaps compared to how lisp was to other langs in the say 1980s: Quite far beyond all. Launch Mathematica 11 by double clicking on the icon. Scroll down to and open the Statistics folder. To find it on these computers: Click on the Lab Applications folder on the Desktop. Stephen Wolfram has a blog entry about Mathematica 7. Computer Labs with Mathematica All of the computer labs that are on the Grand Valley State University network have Mathematica installed on them. Put another way: how Mathematica does things doesnt necessarily correspond to 'manual' methods. Note: I'm not affiliated with Wolfram Research Inc. A typical problem is that Mathematica has many internal optimizations, and the efficiency of a computation can be greatly affected by whether the details of the computation do or do not allow a given internal optimization to be used. ML, …, and scripting langs Python, Perl, Ruby… Programing langs, such as C, C++, Java, and research langs Lisp, Wolfram Research's Mathematica Version 7 has just been released.Īmong it's marketing material, it has a section on how mathematicaĪnd on this page, there are sections where Mathematica is compared to
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |